[PT-BR] Translating Type Checking JavaScript Files #1422
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the PR! This section of the codebase is owned by @khaosdoctor and @danilofuchs - if they write a comment saying "LGTM" then it will be merged. |
khaosdoctor
suggested changes
Jan 7, 2021
packages/documentation/copy/pt/javascript/Type Checking JavaScript Files.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/documentation/copy/pt/javascript/Type Checking JavaScript Files.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/documentation/copy/pt/javascript/Type Checking JavaScript Files.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/documentation/copy/pt/javascript/Type Checking JavaScript Files.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/documentation/copy/pt/javascript/Type Checking JavaScript Files.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/documentation/copy/pt/javascript/Type Checking JavaScript Files.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/documentation/copy/pt/javascript/Type Checking JavaScript Files.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/documentation/copy/pt/javascript/Type Checking JavaScript Files.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/documentation/copy/pt/javascript/Type Checking JavaScript Files.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/documentation/copy/pt/javascript/Type Checking JavaScript Files.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Lucas Santos <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Santos <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Santos <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Santos <[email protected]>
|
This PR will need a rebase BTW (I can't push one) |
Could you be more clear about how the rebase should look like? I was fearing that I would have to do one, but I don't really know how or if I should really do it. Edit: How the commits should look like** |
khaosdoctor
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2021
|
lgtm |
|
Merging because @khaosdoctor is a code-owner of all the changes - thanks! |
|
well, it went through... That's weird |
|
Interesting, maybe the API allows for merges even when the UI says it's not feasible - I added code to check that it's mergeable to the bot |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Starting translation and creating draft PR