Open
Description
Type queries combined with indexed access types currently produce a parse tree that is surprising in its behavior.
One would think that typeof Foo['bar']
would be parsed as typeof (Foo['bar'])
, which would really be something like typeof Foo.bar
.
That's not the case. It's actually parsed as (typeof Foo)['bar']
.
Conveniently, it seems that semantically (when type-checking) these are identical, but it seems strange for syntactic consumers. Do we believe this is currently working as intended?