Do not issue ` Left side of comma operator is unused and has no side effects` error on `(0, expr)` this-removing pattern

[weswigham]

Both our and babel's output emits (0, expr) in many places to unbind the this from the call that's about to be done. Ergo, the 0, expr pattern is not without side-effects, and is, in fact, a very highly used pattern that we probably shouldn't issue an error on. It's probably OK to special-case the literal-zero LHS as a signal to silence the error.

[RyanCavanaugh]

I would prefer 0 as the left operand and the parent expression is a call

[muuvmuuv]

Damn, any workaround for this? I am in a NX Workspace, and we are trying to compile a custom executor.

 >  NX   ⨯ Unable to compile TypeScript:

   apps/entergon/webpack.config.ts:9:19 - error TS2695: Left side of comma operator is unused and has no side effects.

   9 const _default = (0, _webpack.createConfig)("entergon", (config)=>{

[shicks]

This is a duplicate of #35866

[shicks]

This should be able to be closed now that #51989 is merged.

[RyanCavanaugh]

Thanks!