Closed
Description
Bug Report
A setter can have an argument with a self-referential annotation, and this argument will implicitly have type any
, with TS producing no errors for it.
🔎 Search Terms
setter, implicit any
🕗 Version & Regression Information
As far back as 4.3 (when we first let setters/getters in type literals).
⏯ Playground Link
Playground link with relevant code
💻 Code
declare var y: {
set prop2(arg: typeof y.prop2);
};
🙁 Actual behavior
We don't get any errors, even with noImplicitAny
set.
But arg
has implicitly type any
, because its type annotation refers to the type of the setter itself, and there are no getters.
🙂 Expected behavior
An error on prop2
or arg
, at least under noImplicitAny
.