Compute dervied generic-ness for substitutions and create lower priority inferences for substitutes #43765
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #43591
We're been making non-generic substitutions for quite awhile now, but haven't handled them appropriately in
isGenericObjectType
orisGenericIndexType
(they behave as though they're generic, hence the unexecuted conditional in the linked issue). With that in place, the linked issue further makes it obvious that these substitutions can create unwanted inference results -Array<number> extends Array<infer T>
should clearly infernumber
forT
, but naively does not in this context, becauseArray<number>
actually substitutes toArray<number> & Array<any>
, which in turn taints the result. By making an inference from the base type of the substitute first, and then a lower priority inference from the full substitute, we can preferentially pull the result from the original, un-substituted type where possible (thus allowing the result from the linked issue to be the expectednumber
).