-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
Avoid subtype reduction when creating a union result in discriminateTypeByDiscriminableItems
#54052
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid subtype reduction when creating a union result in discriminateTypeByDiscriminableItems
#54052
Conversation
…TypeByDiscriminableItems`
@typescript-bot test this |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the abridged perf test suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the tarball bundle task on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Hey @jakebailey, I've packed this into an installable tgz. You can install it for testing by referencing it in your
and then running There is also a playground for this build and an npm module you can use via |
@jakebailey Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing There were infrastructure failures potentially unrelated to your change:
Otherwise... Everything looks good! |
@jakebailey Here they are:Comparison Report - main..54052
System
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
@typescript-bot perf test this faster |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the abridged perf test suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
@jakebailey Here they are:Comparison Report - main..54052
System
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
Hey @jakebailey, the results of running the DT tests are ready. |
@jakebailey Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
this is for 5.1 regression, is there any chance to get some eyes on it before the stable release? |
@typescript-bot test this |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the tarball bundle task on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the abridged perf test suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at 1ef6b24. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Hey @DanielRosenwasser, I've packed this into an installable tgz. You can install it for testing by referencing it in your
and then running There is also a playground for this build and an npm module you can use via |
In general I think this is a good change, we really shouldn't be subtype reducing contextual types (elsewhere we specifically avoid it). Seems like there's a slight performance regression in |
@DanielRosenwasser Here they are:Comparison Report - main..54052
System
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
@DanielRosenwasser Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing There were infrastructure failures potentially unrelated to your change:
Otherwise... Everything looks good! |
Hey @DanielRosenwasser, the results of running the DT tests are ready. |
@DanielRosenwasser Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
It seems that this PR got preliminary approval from @ahejlsberg . I wonder if it could land before 5.1 (and be cherry-picked into it) since its due date was supposed to be... yesterday 😅 (according to the 5.1 iteration plan) |
…on-on-discriminated-items
Sorry, can you link back to where? @weswigham can you take a look? |
I called it preliminary since it didnt come with a more formal ✅ :P |
fixes #54048 (which is a recent regression from https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/53709/files , cc @ahejlsberg )