-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
Don't skip elaborations when reporting errors for cached failed relations #55234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Andarist
wants to merge
9
commits into
microsoft:main
from
Andarist:dont-skip-elaboration-on-cached-entries
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eaba5a1
Don't skip elaborations when reporting errors for cached failed relat…
Andarist c7e33ff
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into dont-skip-elaboration…
Andarist 8a0b6c0
update existing baselines
Andarist 16085d5
Remove `RelationComparisonResult.Reported` entirely
Andarist 4a88fbd
new test case
Andarist add4655
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into dont-skip-elaboration…
Andarist 09a199d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into dont-skip-elaboration…
Andarist b29b639
Update `RelationComparisonResult`
Andarist 0611fbb
update baseline
Andarist File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sandersn @ahejlsberg those are lines that were not at all here when I created this PR. When syncing with
main
now I removed theRelationComparisonResult.Reported
- just like it was done everywhere else here but I'm not sure if this should actually be done here.Those lines come from #55851
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, the CI shows that this actually is important as now it's doing a lot of heavy work twice in this pathological case and the CI timeouts.
If we take a closer look at this baseline (even on
main
) we might notice that it's actually reporting 2 errors at the same location:TypeScript/tests/baselines/reference/relationComplexityError.errors.txt
Lines 1 to 2 in 7216ee0
So perhaps If I manage to report this once, the perf problems will go away naturally.