Skip to content

Conversation

@sfoslund
Copy link
Member

@sfoslund sfoslund commented Jul 1, 2025

We are not planning on supporting SPDX 3.0 in the first iteration of the consolidate action, so adding logic to ignore these SBOMs

@sfoslund sfoslund requested a review from a team as a code owner July 1, 2025 18:26
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2025

This PR changes files in the API project. Does it change any of the API interfaces in any way? Please note that this includes the following types of changes:

  • Changing the signature of an existing interface method
  • Adding a new method to an existing interface
  • Adding a required data member to a class that an existing interface method consumes

Because any of these changes can potentially break a downstream consumer with customized interface implementations, these changes need to be treated as breaking changes. Please do one of the following:

Option 1 - Publish this as a breaking change

  1. Update the documentation to show the new functionality
  2. Bump the major version in the next release
  3. Be sure to highlight the breaking changes in the release notes

Option 2 - Refactor the changes to be non-breaking

  1. Review this commit, which adds a new interface in a backward-compatible way
  2. Refactor the change to follow this pattern so that existing interfaces are left completely intact
  3. Bump the minor version in the next release

@sfoslund sfoslund merged commit 60e8da4 into main Jul 1, 2025
5 checks passed
@sfoslund sfoslund deleted the sfoslund/spdx3 branch July 1, 2025 19:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants