[Armada] HTTP Code generation for PerNodePlacement

[iYzeee23]

• Summary
  • Regenerates the Service Fabric HTTP client and generated HTTP PowerShell surface for opt-in node placement properties
  • This picks up the Swagger change that adds IncludePlacementProperties to the node query REST APIs and exposes the returned NodeInfo.PlacementProperties map in generated client models
• Changes
  • Added includePlacementProperties to generated node client methods:
    • GetNodeInfoListAsync
    • GetNodeInfoAsync
  • Updated generated HTTP requests to send IncludePlacementProperties
  • Added NodeInfo.PlacementProperties as IReadOnlyDictionary<string, string>
  • Updated NodeInfoConverter to deserialize and serialize the placement properties dictionary
  • Added IncludePlacementProperties to generated Get-SFNode HTTP PowerShell
  • Updated generated HTTP PowerShell help XML
• Notes
  • This is generated code only. The runtime behavior and Swagger source are handled in the corresponding Service Fabric runtime and Swagger PRs
  • PlacementProperties is populated only when callers opt in with IncludePlacementProperties=true; existing callers remain source-compatible because the new generated parameter has a default value
• SF and Swagger
  • WindowsFabric
  • Swagger

[olegsych]

Asked a question about this on the Swagger PR - why are we defining options as an int? I expected it to be an enum

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.21%. Comparing base (2e907c5) to head (54a3869).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #591   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    49.21%   49.21%           
========================================
  Files          391      391           
  Lines        18491    18491           
  Branches      1845     1845           
========================================
  Hits          9101     9101           
  Misses        9074     9074           
  Partials       316      316           

Flag	Coverage Δ
ubuntu-latest	48.07% <ø> (ø)
windows-latest	48.11% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.