Add new way to define decorator implementation with $decorators export

[timotheeguerin]

fix #3719

[azure-sdk]

All changed packages have been documented.

• ✅ @typespec/bundler
• ✅ @typespec/compiler
• ✅ @typespec/http
• ✅ @typespec/json-schema
• ✅ @typespec/openapi
• ✅ @typespec/openapi3
• ✅ @typespec/protobuf
• ✅ @typespec/rest
• ✅ @typespec/versioning
• ✅ @typespec/xml

Show changes

@typespec/bundler - fix ✏️

Allow bundling libraries that don't import their main file from the TypeSpec

@typespec/compiler - feature ✏️

Add new way to define decorator implementation with $decorators export.,> ts,> export const $decorators = {,> "TypeSpec.OpenAPI": {,> useRef: $useRef,,> oneOf: $oneOf,,> },,> };,>

@typespec/http - feature ✏️

Internals: Migrate to new api for declaring decorator implementation

@typespec/json-schema - feature ✏️

Internals: Migrate to new api for declaring decorator implementation

@typespec/openapi - feature ✏️

Internals: Migrate to new api for declaring decorator implementation

@typespec/openapi3 - feature ✏️

Internals: Migrate to new api for declaring decorator implementation

@typespec/protobuf - feature ✏️

Internals: Migrate to new api for declaring decorator implementation

@typespec/rest - feature ✏️

Internals: Migrate to new api for declaring decorator implementation

@typespec/versioning - feature ✏️

Internals: Migrate to new api for declaring decorator implementation

@typespec/xml - feature ✏️

Internals: Migrate to new api for declaring decorator implementation

[azure-sdk]

You can try these changes here

🛝 Playground	🌐 Website	📚 Next docs

[chrisradek]

This looks great - I also really like the new separation you added with tsp-index.ts in the library packages.