Attempt to unbork CI round 2 electric boogaloo

[stephanie-eng]

Remove CLANG_TIDY_ARGS to support run-clang-tidy
Also pin industrial_ci to a specific commit hash, so that way we can break things when we want to, and not when someone else pushes something.

I haven't tested this at all, so I'm just hoping that this is the sum total of all the things we need to get to green checks again.

[EzraBrooks]

I suspect it's going to fail on "upload clang-tidy changes" since I think that is expecting some files to exist that will exist no longer after this change?

Not that anyone ever looked at those clang-tidy changes, I don't think - we can likely remove them.

The PR that merged upstream was actually entirely intended to get rid of that sort of workaround and allow people to use the built-in "fixes file" feature in clang-tidy.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 46.20%. Comparing base (6d020ab) to head (b9a12ba).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3640      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   46.17%   46.20%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         726      726              
  Lines       59419    59413       -6     
  Branches     7619     7621       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        27433    27446      +13     
+ Misses      31820    31800      -20     
- Partials      166      167       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[EzraBrooks]

well it passed anyway so whatever