-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
support PEP484 function argument annotation #65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
cc: Asana: by: 顏孜羲 <[email protected]>
Thanks for the work here @d2207197 This would need to pass existing tests (currently you're failing due to Python 2 failures) and also add new tests verifying that this works in all reasonable cases. |
16f1d69
to
cad1593
Compare
|
I'm glad to see this. I hope you don't mind but I added a commit with a couple of tests here. It looks like this doesn't yet work as expected with methods? Any thoughts on how best to address this? |
cc: Asana: by: 顏孜羲 <[email protected]>
@mrocklin |
Wow, 2.5 years since #4 -- I think that was back when we were all trying to figure out the "right" way to handle annotations! I think these days we know that method in this PR IS the right way ( One suggestion is to add a test almost identical to |
Thanks for the suggestion. I added the test case in 96d092b |
Is this PR ready to be merged in? |
I apologize for letting this linger. My inbox has become increasingly less organized/managed recently. cc'ing @llllllllll in case he wants to take a look |
Hi @mrocklin |
Sure. Looks good. I apologize again for my poor response on this. Thank you so much for implementing this. I suspect that many people will appreciate it. |
No description provided.