[docs] Fix small typo in NumberField page#47877
Merged
ZeeshanTamboli merged 3 commits intomui:masterfrom Mar 2, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Netlify deploy previewBundle size report
|
auto-merge was automatically disabled
February 28, 2026 06:23
Repository rule violations found
Contributor
Author
|
@ZeeshanTamboli thanks for the review! I re-pushed an empty commit to re-trigger the CI as a test was in a loading state (Continuous Integration) just as random guess, all good with this?
|
|
Cherry-pick PRs will be created targeting branches: v7.x |
github-actions Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2026
Co-authored-by: ZeeshanTamboli <zeeshan.tamboli@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just a small typo I noticed in the documentation (here) - hope it's fine to open a pull request for this
Thanks for your work! 😊
ps: not sure about the required label check failing - because there's no related issue?
I didn't want to open one just for this tiny change, let me know if I missed something