Skip to content

Graph type update for Cypher 5 Constraints#1395

Merged
rsill-neo4j merged 15 commits intoneo4j:cypher-5from
JPryce-Aklundh:5-graphtypes
Mar 6, 2026
Merged

Graph type update for Cypher 5 Constraints#1395
rsill-neo4j merged 15 commits intoneo4j:cypher-5from
JPryce-Aklundh:5-graphtypes

Conversation

@JPryce-Aklundh
Copy link
Collaborator

@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh commented Sep 25, 2025

ToDo:

  • Replace 2025.xx with actual month of release (currently not confirmed)

Related PRs:

Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for not reviewing this before Jens left

rsill-neo4j and others added 2 commits January 14, 2026 15:27
Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <scout.therese@gmail.com>
@rsill-neo4j rsill-neo4j marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2026 15:55
Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some new comments (and I couldn't check the built version as it seems to not be up to date with the updates)

Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some new comments

rsill-neo4j and others added 2 commits January 20, 2026 14:16
Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <scout.therese@gmail.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the status of this PR? Is it ready to be merged/need anything else? I guess it should go in together with the graph type one?

Or are we deciding to do like for the vector index docs and just keep these until GA instead of preview? I'd probably prefer to just get things merged as if you are trying out the new things these things will apply and if you're not then they are not relevant but also don't hurt 🤷 And it's nice to do the constraint page restructuring in both the 5 and 25 docs around the same time.

…ty.adoc

Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <scout.therese@gmail.com>
@rsill-neo4j
Copy link
Contributor

What is the status of this PR? Is it ready to be merged/need anything else? I guess it should go in together with the graph type one?

Or are we deciding to do like for the vector index docs and just keep these until GA instead of preview? I'd probably prefer to just get things merged as if you are trying out the new things these things will apply and if you're not then they are not relevant but also don't hurt 🤷 And it's nice to do the constraint page restructuring in both the 5 and 25 docs around the same time.

yes, let's merge it with the graph types preview -
however, since this targets 5.x directly, we have to wait until the release day not to publish this earlier than graph types

@neo4j-docops-agent
Copy link
Collaborator

neo4j-docops-agent commented Feb 20, 2026

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

rsill-neo4j added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2026
This should be the same as
#1391

The changes from #1325 have
been incorporated.


I was unable to push to the fork 1391 was created from, that's why i
raised a new PR

ToDo (moved over from the other PR, not sure how relevant they still
are):

- Clarify graph types wrt GQL appendix
- Replace 2025.xx with actual month of release (currently not confirmed)

Related PRs:
- Redirect PR:
neo-technology/neo4j-manual-modeling-antora#745
- Related Cypher 5 changes:
#1395
- Cheat sheet: neo4j/docs-cheat-sheet#259

---------

Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <therese.magnusson@neo4j.com>
@rsill-neo4j rsill-neo4j merged commit 534eb63 into neo4j:cypher-5 Mar 6, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants