Skip to content

Interface Bulk Edit requires interface "type" #19275

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
DanSheps opened this issue Apr 22, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #19283
Closed

Interface Bulk Edit requires interface "type" #19275

DanSheps opened this issue Apr 22, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #19283
Assignees
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Milestone

Comments

@DanSheps
Copy link
Member

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v4.2.8

Python Version

3.11

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Go to DCIM > Interfaces
  2. Select multiple interfaces
  3. Edit the interfaces
  4. Enter in something for "Label" but leave other fields empty

Expected Behavior

Interface(s) are edited properly

Observed Behavior

Interface Edit page "jumps" to the "label" field

@DanSheps DanSheps added severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application labels Apr 22, 2025
@DanSheps DanSheps self-assigned this Apr 22, 2025
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added this to the v4.2.9 milestone Apr 23, 2025
@jeremystretch jeremystretch marked this as a duplicate of #19300 Apr 24, 2025
@jeremystretch jeremystretch marked this as a duplicate of #19319 Apr 25, 2025
@jeremystretch jeremystretch marked this as a duplicate of #19359 Apr 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
2 participants