Skip to content

Use p80 and ipv4 pool.sks-keyservers.net to avoid alpine gpg dns resolution #623

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

paolomainardi
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #622

@paolomainardi paolomainardi changed the title fix alpine gpg ipv4 host Use p80 and ipv4 to avoid alpine gpg dns resolution Feb 5, 2018
@paolomainardi paolomainardi changed the title Use p80 and ipv4 to avoid alpine gpg dns resolution Use p80 and ipv4 pool.sks-keyservers.net to avoid alpine gpg dns resolution Feb 5, 2018
@paolomainardi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fix for #621

kfarnung

This comment was marked as off-topic.

chorrell

This comment was marked as off-topic.

tianon

This comment was marked as off-topic.

kfarnung

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@chorrell
Copy link
Contributor

chorrell commented Feb 7, 2018

@nodejs/docker I'm good to merge this if there are no objections

SimenB

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@chorrell chorrell merged commit a3c5295 into nodejs:master Feb 8, 2018
kfarnung added a commit to kfarnung/docker-node that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2018
Ran the script and noticed a few issues:
* Removed whitespace from Dockerfile-stretch.template to match the
  existing files
* Let the script update the other files for consistency
kfarnung added a commit to kfarnung/docker-node that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2018
Ran the script and noticed a few issues:
* Removed whitespace from Dockerfile-stretch.template to match the
  existing files
* Let the script update the other files for consistency
@chorrell chorrell mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants