Skip to content

Why path.basename behaves differently by platform? #6587

@sttk

Description

@sttk
  • Version: 0.10, 0.11, 4, 5, 6
  • Platform: darwin, linux, win32
  • Subsystem: path

  1. When path is non-string

    [darwin] path.basename(null);  // => TypeError
    [linux]  path.basename(null);  // => 'null'
    [win32]  path.basename(null);  // => 'null'
    
    [darwin] path.basename(123);  // => TypeError
    [linux]  path.basename(123);  // => '123'
    [win32]  path.basename(123);  // => '123'
  2. When ext matches path's tail and contains a path separator.

    [darwin] path.basename('aaa/bbb', '/bbb');   // => ''
    [linux]  path.basename('aaa/bbb', '/bbb');   // => ''
    [win32]  path.basename('aaa/bbb', '/bbb');   // => 'bbb'
    [win32]  path.basename('aaa\\bbb', '\\bbb'); // => 'bbb'
    
    [darwin] path.basename('aaa/bbb', 'a/bbb');   // => ''
    [linux]  path.basename('aaa/bbb', 'a/bbb');   // => ''
    [win32]  path.basename('aaa/bbb', 'a/bbb');   // => 'bbb'
    [win32]  path.basename('aaa\\bbb', 'a\\bbb'); // => 'bbb'

    FYI, basename command behaves as follows (I checked on darwin and linux):

    $ basename aaa/bbb bbb
    bbb
    $ basename aaa/bbb /bbb
    bbb
    $ basename aaa/bbb a/bbb
    bbb
    

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    pathIssues and PRs related to the path subsystem.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions