Skip to content

explain the lts naming scheme#237

Merged
csabapalfi merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
better-lts-naming-description
Oct 12, 2015
Merged

explain the lts naming scheme#237
csabapalfi merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
better-lts-naming-description

Conversation

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

s/simple/actual description/ :)

cc @jasnell & @nodejs/website

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 added the content Issues/pr concerning content label Oct 12, 2015
@phillipj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

@jasnell
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jasnell commented Oct 12, 2015

Picky picky picky...:-) LGTM

@csabapalfi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM. Merging now that 2 owners and 2 collaborators saw it. :)

csabapalfi added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2015
@csabapalfi csabapalfi merged commit 0cbae48 into master Oct 12, 2015
@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 deleted the better-lts-naming-description branch October 13, 2015 17:11
@mikeal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mikeal commented Oct 13, 2015

Is there a good document that describes LTS and the difference between v4 and v5?

@narqo
Copy link
Copy Markdown

narqo commented Oct 13, 2015

@mikeal I believe nodejs/Release#44 is the right place from where such document should appear.

BTW, if anyone interested, for me personally, this article by @rvagg is an example of what this document should describe.

@zeke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

zeke commented Oct 13, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

content Issues/pr concerning content

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants