-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
Improve Jest matchers #547
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
enhancement
Enhancement to existing features
Comments
s1hofmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2023
s1hofmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2023
…ssibility to pass a region to directly specify a search region instead of the whole screen
s1hofmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2023
s1hofmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2023
…ssibility to pass a region to directly specify a search region instead of the whole screen
s1hofmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2023
s1hofmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2023
s1hofmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2023
s1hofmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2023
s1hofmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2023
s1hofmann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 14, 2023
* (#547) New matcher toHaveColor that verifies pixel colors on screen * (#547) Updated toShow to support full search parameters, added the possibility to pass a region to directly specify a search region instead of the whole screen * (#547) Expose new matchers * (#547) npm audit fix * (#547) Try to increase node heap space * (#547) Try to increase node heap space * (#547) Get rid of Docker tests * (#547) Addressed some sonar issues * (#547) Don't run coverage report again after the first stage
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Short overview
The currently implemented Jest matchers could be extended and improved
Detailed description
It would be nice to have an additional matcher to validate pixel colours via
toHaveColor
.Additionally, the
toShow
matcher does not accept a proper parameter object which makes it hard to configure some pluginsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: