bug(#3481): use functions instead of lambdas#3817
Merged
yegor256 merged 5 commits intoJan 15, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@yegor256 please check |
|
@maxonfjvipon Great job on your contribution! 🎉 You've earned +8 points: +4 base, +7 for 151 hits-of-code, and -4 for minimal comments. Remember, quality matters too! Keep up the good work. Your current balance is +36. Looking forward to your next contribution! |
|
@yegor256 Hey there! 👋 Thanks for your review! You've earned +4 points, which is the minimum reward according to our policy. While we couldn't add points for hits-of-code or multiple comments this time, remember that more detailed reviews can earn you up to 24 points! Keep in mind, 6+ comments could avoid that -10 point deduction. Your current balance is -96. Looking forward to your next review! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ref: #3481