Skip to content

chore(deps): update zerocracy/pages-action action to v0.0.45 - autoclosed#4007

Merged
yegor256 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/zerocracy-pages-action-0.x
Mar 16, 2025
Merged

chore(deps): update zerocracy/pages-action action to v0.0.45 - autoclosed#4007
yegor256 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/zerocracy-pages-action-0.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
zerocracy/pages-action action patch 0.0.44 -> 0.0.45

Release Notes

zerocracy/pages-action (zerocracy/pages-action)

v0.0.45: fb 0.9.2

Compare Source

See #​224, release log:

Released by Rultor 2.0-SNAPSHOT, see build log


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the core label Mar 14, 2025
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Performance Analysis

Test Base Score PR Score Change % Change Unit Mode
benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToEO 146.080 163.504 17.424 11.93% ms/op Average Time
benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToPhi 185.524 176.842 -8.682 -4.68% ms/op Average Time
benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToSaltyPhi 140.704 146.353 5.650 4.02% ms/op Average Time

⚠️ Performance loss: benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToEO is slower by 17.424 ms/op (11.93%)
✅ Performance gain: benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToPhi is faster by 8.682 ms/op (4.68%)
⚠️ Performance loss: benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToSaltyPhi is slower by 5.650 ms/op (4.02%)

@yegor256

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rultor please, try to merge, since 24 checks have passed

@rultor

rultor commented Mar 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rultor please, try to merge, since 24 checks have passed

@yegor256 OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here.

@rultor

rultor commented Mar 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rultor please, try to merge, since 24 checks have passed

@renovate[bot] @yegor256 Oops, I failed. You can see the full log here (spent 11min).

	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:497)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:274)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1655)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:497)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1541)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1541)

[ERROR] integration.SnippetIT.runsAllSnippets(String, Path)[2] -- Time elapsed: 4.234 s <<< ERROR!
com.yegor256.farea.Farea$BuildFailureException: build failed with exit code 0x0001
	at com.yegor256.farea.Farea.exec(Farea.java:302)
	at integration.SnippetIT.lambda$runsAllSnippets$1(SnippetIT.java:112)
	at com.yegor256.farea.Farea.together(Farea.java:179)
	at integration.SnippetIT.runsAllSnippets(SnippetIT.java:53)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:183)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$2$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:177)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:183)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.LinkedList$LLSpliterator.forEachRemaining(LinkedList.java:1239)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$Head.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:658)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:274)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1655)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:497)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:274)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1655)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:497)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1541)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1541)

WARN  c.y.MayBeSlow - We're still running runsTestsAfterPhiAndUnphi (12s), please wait...
WARN  c.y.MayBeSlow - We're still running runsTestsAfterPhiAndUnphi (20s), please wait...
WARN  c.y.MayBeSlow - We're still running runsTestsAfterPhiAndUnphi (30s), please wait...
/home/r/script.sh: line 9:  1597 Killed                  mvn clean install -Pqulice --errors -Dstyle.color=never
container 2f800d115fccbeaa0af5d97c5b09461106e73f99ab7e719aaf1cf859e03cae6a is dead
Fri Mar 14 19:49:48 UTC 2025

@yegor256 yegor256 enabled auto-merge March 16, 2025 04:45
@yegor256 yegor256 added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 6cb9341 Mar 16, 2025
@yegor256 yegor256 deleted the renovate/zerocracy-pages-action-0.x branch March 16, 2025 04:45
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update zerocracy/pages-action action to v0.0.45 chore(deps): update zerocracy/pages-action action to v0.0.45 - autoclosed Mar 16, 2025
@0crat

0crat commented Mar 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@yegor256 Thank you for your code review contribution. We appreciate your effort, but there's room for improvement. According to our policy, you've earned 4 points: +4 base points, -10 for having fewer than 6 comments (only 4 were made), -8 for insufficient hits-of-code (only 2), and +18 to meet the minimum reward. For future reviews, aim for more detailed comments and a higher hit-of-code count to maximize your points. Keep up the good work and let's continue improving our code quality together! 💻👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants