Skip to content

chore(deps): update teatimeguest/setup-texlive-action action to v3.4.0#4008

Merged
yegor256 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/teatimeguest-setup-texlive-action-3.x
Mar 16, 2025
Merged

chore(deps): update teatimeguest/setup-texlive-action action to v3.4.0#4008
yegor256 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/teatimeguest-setup-texlive-action-3.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Mar 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
teatimeguest/setup-texlive-action action minor v3.3.4 -> v3.4.0

Release Notes

teatimeguest/setup-texlive-action (teatimeguest/setup-texlive-action)

v3.4.0

Compare Source

Full Commit SHA
730ac096afc103e9a40b0b44479b798a62cfdae2
Features
Bug Fixes
  • 93f7ad5 avoid using CTAN master repository
  • 9c887f4 improve detection of repository initialization errors
Dependency Updates

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the core label Mar 15, 2025
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Performance Analysis

Test Base Score PR Score Change % Change Unit Mode
benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToEO 159.958 182.231 22.274 13.92% ms/op Average Time
benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToPhi 180.336 195.179 14.843 8.23% ms/op Average Time
benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToSaltyPhi 152.889 156.179 3.290 2.15% ms/op Average Time

⚠️ Performance loss: benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToEO is slower by 22.274 ms/op (13.92%)
⚠️ Performance loss: benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToPhi is slower by 14.843 ms/op (8.23%)
⚠️ Performance loss: benchmarks.XmirBench.xmirToSaltyPhi is slower by 3.290 ms/op (2.15%)

@yegor256

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rultor please, try to merge, since 24 checks have passed

@rultor

rultor commented Mar 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rultor please, try to merge, since 24 checks have passed

@yegor256 OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here.

@rultor

rultor commented Mar 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rultor please, try to merge, since 24 checks have passed

@renovate[bot] @yegor256 Oops, I failed. You can see the full log here (spent 11min).

	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:497)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:274)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1655)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:497)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1541)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1541)

[ERROR] integration.SnippetIT.runsAllSnippets(String, Path)[2] -- Time elapsed: 3.156 s <<< ERROR!
com.yegor256.farea.Farea$BuildFailureException: build failed with exit code 0x0001
	at com.yegor256.farea.Farea.exec(Farea.java:302)
	at integration.SnippetIT.lambda$runsAllSnippets$1(SnippetIT.java:112)
	at com.yegor256.farea.Farea.together(Farea.java:179)
	at integration.SnippetIT.runsAllSnippets(SnippetIT.java:53)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:183)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$2$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:177)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:183)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.LinkedList$LLSpliterator.forEachRemaining(LinkedList.java:1239)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$Head.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:658)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:274)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1655)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:497)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:274)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1655)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:497)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1541)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1541)

WARN  c.y.MayBeSlow - We're still running runsTestsAfterPhiAndUnphi (12s), please wait...
WARN  c.y.MayBeSlow - We're still running runsTestsAfterPhiAndUnphi (20s), please wait...
WARN  c.y.MayBeSlow - We're still running runsTestsAfterPhiAndUnphi (30s), please wait...
/home/r/script.sh: line 9:  1597 Killed                  mvn clean install -Pqulice --errors -Dstyle.color=never
container c7311383abe21c63d19aa3e5717ca8cddb43dbfe3e4ecf5febb50ac02bf8c64e is dead
Sat Mar 15 22:51:19 UTC 2025

@yegor256 yegor256 added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit a26663a Mar 16, 2025
@yegor256 yegor256 deleted the renovate/teatimeguest-setup-texlive-action-3.x branch March 16, 2025 04:45
@0crat

0crat commented Mar 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@yegor256 🌟 Great job on your review! You've earned 4 points for your contribution. While we'd love to see more comments and hits-of-code in future reviews, we appreciate your effort and have adjusted your score to ensure you receive recognition. Keep up the good work and continue improving! 💪

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants