You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
stroke and strokeOpacity are documented as standard mark channels, but they are not supported on text marks. (Related, rules also do not yet support strokeOpacity as channel #466, and in the near future, strokeWidth may become a standard mark channel #311.)
My inclination is that we should probably support these as channels on text marks, even if they will almost never be used; alternatively, we could explicitly call out in the documentation that these standard channels are not supported on text marks, but that would leave a gotcha for anyone who doesn’t exactingly read the full documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
stroke and strokeOpacity are documented as standard mark channels, but they are not supported on text marks. (Related, rules also do not yet support strokeOpacity as channel #466, and in the near future, strokeWidth may become a standard mark channel #311.)
My inclination is that we should probably support these as channels on text marks, even if they will almost never be used; alternatively, we could explicitly call out in the documentation that these standard channels are not supported on text marks, but that would leave a gotcha for anyone who doesn’t exactingly read the full documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: