Skip to content

Double translation: lambda lifting improvements #1792

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
vouillon opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Double translation: lambda lifting improvements #1792

vouillon opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@vouillon
Copy link
Member

vouillon commented Jan 7, 2025

  • We don't need to lift all CPS functions. We just need that the code which is going to be duplicated contain no closures.
  • Lifted functions which have no free variable don't need to be wrapped.
OlivierNicole added a commit to OlivierNicole/js_of_ocaml that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2025
This addresses the second remark in ocsigen#1792: lifted functions that have no
free variables don't need to be wrapped.
OlivierNicole added a commit to OlivierNicole/js_of_ocaml that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2025
This addresses the second remark in ocsigen#1792: lifted functions that have no
free variables don't need to be wrapped.
OlivierNicole added a commit to OlivierNicole/js_of_ocaml that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2025
This addresses the second remark in ocsigen#1792: lifted functions that have no
free variables don't need to be wrapped.
hhugo pushed a commit to OlivierNicole/js_of_ocaml that referenced this issue May 9, 2025
This addresses the second remark in ocsigen#1792: lifted functions that have no
free variables don't need to be wrapped.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants