Skip to content

fix: progressive sync for applicationSet needs to evaluate more application status fields #67

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

mikeshng
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jnpacker and xiangjingli April 26, 2025 22:12
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 26, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mikeshng

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mikeshng mikeshng removed the request for review from jnpacker April 26, 2025 22:13
@xiangjingli
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Apr 26, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit dfcf58b into open-cluster-management-io:main Apr 26, 2025
5 checks passed
@mikeshng mikeshng deleted the progressive-sync branch April 26, 2025 23:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants