bump version to v1.0.0

[RunningLeon]

Motivation

bump version to v1.0.0

Modification

Bump version to v1.0.0
Update docs for switching default branch to main

BC-breaking (Optional)

Does the modification introduce changes that break the backward-compatibility of the downstream repositories?
If so, please describe how it breaks the compatibility and how the downstream projects should modify their code to keep compatibility with this PR.

Use cases (Optional)

If this PR introduces a new feature, it is better to list some use cases here, and update the documentation.

Checklist

1. Pre-commit or other linting tools are used to fix the potential lint issues.
2. The modification is covered by complete unit tests. If not, please add more unit tests to ensure the correctness.
3. If the modification has a dependency on downstream projects of a newer version, this PR should be tested with all supported versions of downstream projects.
4. The documentation has been modified accordingly, like docstring or example tutorials.

[irexyc]

A fix

diff --git a/tools/package_tools/test/test_sdk.sh b/tools/package_tools/test/test_sdk.sh
index 57e27de75..472a8d5b4 100755
--- a/tools/package_tools/test/test_sdk.sh
+++ b/tools/package_tools/test/test_sdk.sh
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ cp -r $test_pkg $work_dir
 pushd $work_dir

 # opencv
-if [[ ! -d $OpenCV_DIR ]]; then
+if [ ! -d "$OpenCV_DIR" ]; then
     ./install_opencv.sh
 fi

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@0196cd0). Click here to learn what that means.
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1960   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   49.44%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      338           
  Lines           ?    12920           
  Branches        ?     1897           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     6388           
  Misses          ?     6088           
  Partials        ?      444           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	49.44% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.