[Fix] Fix accepting an unexpected argument local-rank in PyTorch 2.0.

[sunjiahao1999]

Thanks for your contribution and we appreciate it a lot. The following instructions would make your pull request more healthy and more easily get feedback. If you do not understand some items, don't worry, just make the pull request and seek help from maintainers.

Motivation

Please describe the motivation of this PR and the goal you want to achieve through this PR.

Modification

Related PR.

BC-breaking (Optional)

Does the modification introduce changes that break the back-compatibility of the downstream repos?
If so, please describe how it breaks the compatibility and how the downstream projects should modify their code to keep compatibility with this PR.

Use cases (Optional)

If this PR introduces a new feature, it is better to list some use cases here, and update the documentation.

Checklist

1. Pre-commit or other linting tools are used to fix the potential lint issues.
2. The modification is covered by complete unit tests. If not, please add more unit test to ensure the correctness.
3. If the modification has potential influence on downstream projects, this PR should be tested with downstream projects.
4. The documentation has been modified accordingly, like docstring or example tutorials.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (ee6cc04) 47.16% compared to head (15b953b) 47.16%.

❗ Current head 15b953b differs from pull request most recent head 6db9b0f. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6db9b0f to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           dev-1.x    #2387   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    47.16%   47.16%           
========================================
  Files          273      273           
  Lines        22665    22665           
  Branches      3535     3535           
========================================
  Hits         10690    10690           
  Misses       11294    11294           
  Partials       681      681           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	47.16% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.