Skip to content

License #10

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
cuuupid opened this issue Feb 14, 2019 · 8 comments
Closed

License #10

cuuupid opened this issue Feb 14, 2019 · 8 comments

Comments

@cuuupid
Copy link

cuuupid commented Feb 14, 2019

Hi, is there a license associated with this/any plans towards MIT licensing this model?

@WuTheFWasThat
Copy link
Contributor

good question, will get back to you!

@cuuupid
Copy link
Author

cuuupid commented Feb 18, 2019

From the official blog post:

We will further publicly discuss this strategy in six months. If you’d like to discuss large language models and their implications, please email us at: [email protected]. And if you’re excited about working on cutting-edge language models (and thinking through their policy implications), we’re hiring.

As a follow-up question, is there a possibility of licensing this model under an "ethical" license? i.e. rather than restricting use economically, restricting use ethically. While it doesn't do much to limit illegitimate use, it puts in place some level of legal hindrance which could go a long way in other models as well as to stopping malicious use of AI in the enterprise world.

@WuTheFWasThat
Copy link
Contributor

Added MIT license!

@pshah123 we considered "ethical license"-type ideas, but since we wouldn't be able to effectively enforce it (i.e. sue people), we decided to go with plain MIT. (BTW, it was pointed out that the JSON License has a provision that states: “The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.”, but that it's probably not effective as a practical matter)

@reuben
Copy link

reuben commented Feb 20, 2019

@WuTheFWasThat just double checking, did you reach out to authors of pull requests created/merged before the license was added to request their permission to license their contributions under the MIT license terms? I'm asking because this can taint the license of the entire project and cause problems with downstream users, as all contributions made without the license can be assumed to be all rights reserved.

@WuTheFWasThat
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for bringing that to my attention, i'll check now

@xhluca
Copy link

xhluca commented Nov 5, 2019

@WuTheFWasThat Do the weights (1.5B) uploaded on GCP have the same license as the models?

@WuTheFWasThat
Copy link
Contributor

yes

@rosabor
Copy link

rosabor commented Dec 19, 2019

Just confirming that GPT-2 can be used commercially like for writing books? Got a bit confused by a blogpost with a legal agreement on the OpenAI site, but the MIT license seems to say its all good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants