Add open governance principles#4
Open
cornelius wants to merge 1 commit intoopengovernance:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The opengovernance.dev site is a great resource, because there are not many neutral explanations of what open governance for an open source project means. But this is a crucial aspect to make sure that open source works according to its spirit and not only according to the letters of the licenses.
To be able to use it as a defining reference for open governance I think it would be helpful to add a definition of the term. This pull request attempts to do this by adding a section of three defining principles and a short explanation what they mean. For me this would do the trick and make this site the ultimate resource when referring to open governance in the open source world.
What do you think?