8364089: JDK 25 RDP2 L10n resource files update #26467
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back achung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@alisenchung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@alisenchung The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
openjdk
bot
added
javadoc
| @@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ MSG_BundlerFailed=Fehler: Bundler "{1}" ({0}) konnte kein Package generieren | |||
| MSG_BundlerConfigException=Bundler {0} aufgrund eines Konfigurationsproblems übersprungen: {1} \nEmpfehlung zur Behebung: {2} | |||
| MSG_BundlerConfigExceptionNoAdvice=Bundler {0} aufgrund eines Konfigurationsproblems übersprungen: {1} | |||
| MSG_BundlerRuntimeException=Bundler {0} nicht erfolgreich. Grund: {1} | |||
| MSG_BundlerFailed=Fehler: Bundler "{1}" ({0}) konnte kein Package generieren | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Even though there was no change in the original, it looks like they removed this entry because it was a duplicate. We should consider filing a separate issue to have the duplicate removed in the original as well.
| @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ launcher.err.main.not.void=Methode "main" ist nicht mit Rückgabetyp "void" dekl | |||
| launcher.err.cant.find.class=Klasse nicht gefunden: {0} | |||
|
|
|||
| # 0: string | |||
| launcher.err.cant.find.main.method=Konnte keine main(String[])- oder main()-Methode in der Klasse: {0} finden. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As we discussed, even though we used this suggestion last drop, the translation team rejected the translation.
This issue is responsible for updating the translations of all the localize(able) resources in the JDK since the previous L10n drop.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26467/head:pull/26467$ git checkout pull/26467Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26467$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26467/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26467View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26467Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26467.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment