Skip to content

8362279: [vectorapi] VECTOR_OP_SUADD needs reduction support #26486

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

igraves
Copy link
Member

@igraves igraves commented Jul 25, 2025

Adding SUADD to reduction support in the Vector API as it is now treated as an associative operator.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8362279: [vectorapi] VECTOR_OP_SUADD needs reduction support (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26486/head:pull/26486
$ git checkout pull/26486

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26486
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26486/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26486

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26486

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26486.diff

@igraves
Copy link
Member Author

igraves commented Jul 25, 2025

@merykitty If you could review, thanks!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 25, 2025

👋 Welcome back igraves! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2025

@igraves To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • build
  • client
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • graal
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • ide-support
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant