Summit Planning: Draft Agenda

[jorydotcom]

Final Agenda: https://github.com/nodejs/summit/blob/master/2019-05-Berlin/agenda.md

Google Sheet: sheet
Sheet Name: All Rooms

Please let us know, via issue comment or cell comment in the spreadsheet, whether:

• You are hosting a session and request attendance of specific individuals
• You are hosting a session and want to attend a session that conflicts with yours
• You want to attend two sessions happening concurrently

Please be mindful not to accidentally edit the spreadsheet. Time permitting, @joyeecheung has offered to do the scheduling survey to minimize the number of conflicts we might have. We're just hoping to get as much info as we can upfront, so we can help those who want to attend remotely plan accordingly.

I'll reiterate that this is not final and that unfortunately we probably won't be able to resolve all conflicts. But we'll try our best!

We plan to collect comments on this document, then move the schedule into the repo when we finalize it next week.

Agenda Questions to: @jorydotcom, @mcollina, @keywordnew, @evahowe
AV Questions to: @evahowe, @LaRuaNa, @christian_bromann

[joyeecheung]

I have created the form in https://forms.gle/tES95r4qQfxx7GKs7 and added a few collaborators. Please request the collaborator permission of this if you want it.

A few tweaks:

1. I merged modules with Security, modules and Node.js (champion overlap and the first one lacks description, it looks like the latter covers the first one already)
2. I merged Promises in Node core and Promises and the unhandled rejection default (I cannot see who the champion of the first one is from the spreadsheet but the two topics overlap significantly)
3. I changed Package Maintenance to Module Ecosystem and Package Maintenance (@mhdawson) (the first one looks like the result of the CFP form not working correctly)

[guybedford]

Please can we not merge the modules discussion with Security, modules and Node.js topic. The security discussion is its own topic, which will require some background and enough time for discussion while the modules discussion will be a more general discussion around wider modules concerns. If more information is needed for the modules session perhaps @MylesBorins can provide it.

[joyeecheung]

@guybedford Sure, I added the modules discussion back in the form. I don't think we need to recollect data in this case - these two sessions should scheduled together (it does not really make sense to do them e.g. on separate days in separate places), so we can just take the one with the highest attendance as reference when picking the slot/room and leave an extended slot for them.

[guybedford]

@joyeecheung many thanks. That sounds preferable, although if they can't be scheduled together that wouldn't be a problem either.

[jasnell]

Is there a social/dinner event being planned as part of the agenda?

[evahowe]

I sent out an email to all the attendees a couple of hours ago and included a link to the agenda and Joyee's survery so that we can hopefully answer some of these questions. If anyone received it, I would love to know. Eventbrite says it sent it, but for some reason, I feel a bit nervous about it. Yes, there is going to be a party after the end of the first day that saucelabs is sponsoring.

…

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:07 AM James M Snell ***@***.***> wrote: Is there a social/dinner event being planned as part of the agenda? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#166>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKYQ3QPDCQQJFHSIJUFANNTPW26LRANCNFSM4HONL4KQ> .

-- Eva Howe This Dot Labs eva@thisdot.co

[keywordnew]

@evahowe can confirm I've received the above email, and another, subjects:

• Excited for Collab Summit 2019?? (includes links mentioned)
• OpenJS Collaborator Summit Attendance Survey

Both are helpful :)

[evahowe]

yay!!! thank you for letting me know! :)

…

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:39 PM Manil Chowdhury ***@***.***> wrote: @evahowe <https://github.com/evahowe> can confirm I've received the above email, and another, subjects: - Excited for Collab Summit 2019?? (includes links mentioned) - OpenJS Collaborator Summit Attendance Survey Both are helpful :) — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#166>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKYQ3QN4CLT2WOUNQZ2GPRLPW5IPTANCNFSM4HONL4KQ> .

-- Eva Howe This Dot Labs eva@thisdot.co

[mhdawson]

I got the email as well.

[evahowe]

Awesome!

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:28 PM Michael Dawson ***@***.***> wrote: I got the email as well. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#166>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKYQ3QIPEO2CU632ZENZ6XDPXBFYHANCNFSM4HONL4KQ> .

-- Eva Howe This Dot Labs eva@thisdot.co

[WaleedAshraf]

@keywordnew @joyeecheung
Do you guys know who and why changed the timing for "Node.js Collection & Social Media" from 16:00 to 13:00?

I requested it to be 16:00, and it is communicated with @RRomoff also because she would be joining remotely.

In the sheet history, I see it was updated anonymously by someone yesterday.

[keywordnew]

Sorry about that. The requirement must not have been preserved. We moved around a few sessions yesterday. This was one of the ones that got moved up because we felt folks might be more tired than ideal for engagement by end of day. If the 1600 slot is empty, please feel free to move it back there. I don't have a laptop right now.

…

On Wed., May 29, 2019, 17:45 Waleed Ashraf, ***@***.***> wrote: @keywordnew <https://github.com/keywordnew> @joyeecheung <https://github.com/joyeecheung> Do you guys know who and why changed the timing for "Node.js Collection & Social Media" from 16:00 to 13:00? I requested it to be 16:00, and it is communicated with @RRomoff <https://github.com/RRomoff> also because she would be joining remotely. In the sheet history, I see it was updated anonymously by someone yesterday. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#166>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACO3J4YK6BCRB55N3BCODN3PX2QIXANCNFSM4HONL4KQ> .

[WaleedAshraf]

@keywordnew
moved it back. thanks for all the efforts.👍 🍇