Skip to content

Conversation

eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor

Promote HighlyAvailableArbiter to the Default featureSet.

HighlyAvailableArbiter allows deploying an OpenShift cluster with 2 master nodes and 1 arbiter node which will be a smaller capacity machine that will run only the required components for HA to be maintained in edge deployments.

Current Pass Rate: Sippy FeatureSet PassRate 100%
Enhancement PR: openshift/enhancements#1674

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 14, 2025

@eggfoobar: This pull request references OCPEDGE-1945 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Promote HighlyAvailableArbiter to the Default featureSet.

HighlyAvailableArbiter allows deploying an OpenShift cluster with 2 master nodes and 1 arbiter node which will be a smaller capacity machine that will run only the required components for HA to be maintained in edge deployments.

Current Pass Rate: Sippy FeatureSet PassRate 100%
Enhancement PR: openshift/enhancements#1674

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Hello @eggfoobar! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 14, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from cgwalters and JoelSpeed July 14, 2025 09:35
@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @JoelSpeed

Joel, we had originally written a comment that we can not merge this change until we had resolved the tooling issue with having multi feature gates on the same attribute, since you patched this in #2283 would you consider this comment to no longer be relevant? https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2401/files#diff-a8b6135d50534471326ea7bcd20e0f5eae25353f7788338060f718128a6a0b34L701

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/test verify-feature-promotion

I see tests in sippy, so they should appear here too 🤔

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test verify-feature-promotion

I see tests in sippy, so they should appear here too 🤔

Fix incoming, there is a topology diff that causes it not to show up.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 14, 2025
@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

updated integration tests to reference baremetal to keep inline with Arbiter and DualReplica main platform use

Signed-off-by: ehila <[email protected]>
added two node topology support for featuregate test analyzer to match and query sippy for two node test history

Signed-off-by: ehila <[email protected]>
@eggfoobar eggfoobar force-pushed the promote-feature-arbiter-default branch from 4acf014 to cc8f48a Compare July 29, 2025 17:45
@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test verify-feature-promotion

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/retest-required
/hold

Tests are in place and pass rates are nearly there on the latest verify. I'll tag and hold this, feel free to keep /test verify-feature-promotion periodically and unhold once that's gone green

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jul 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 31, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: eggfoobar, JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 31, 2025
@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

Unholding, the feature promotion is above 95% and we have re-gained 99% pass rate in sippy.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c7fbd08 and 2 for PR HEAD cc8f48a in total

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

Known issue in the test here, https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-59603

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 4, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

Known issue in the test here, https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-59603

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 32616f0 and 2 for PR HEAD cc8f48a in total

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 32616f0 and 2 for PR HEAD cc8f48a in total

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

Based on https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-59603, the test failure is a known flake

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 5, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

Based on https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-59603, the test failure is a known flake

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 9f36190 and 2 for PR HEAD cc8f48a in total

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-serial-2of2

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-upgrade-out-of-change

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 9f36190 and 2 for PR HEAD cc8f48a in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f0c2a50 and 1 for PR HEAD cc8f48a in total

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 6, 2025

@eggfoobar: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn cc8f48a link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

Based on https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-59603, the test failure is a known flake

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 6, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

Based on https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-59603, the test failure is a known flake

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 6a7223e into openshift:master Aug 6, 2025
26 of 27 checks passed
@eggfoobar eggfoobar deleted the promote-feature-arbiter-default branch August 6, 2025 12:14
@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-cluster-config-api
This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-config-api-container-v4.20.0-202508061146.p0.g6a7223e.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants