Skip to content

Conversation

eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue(s) this PR addresses:

LVMS 4.17.0 GA

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jerpeter1 and jogeo October 2, 2024 15:01
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 2, 2024
@copejon
Copy link
Contributor

copejon commented Oct 2, 2024

/cc @copejon

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from copejon October 2, 2024 15:05
@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test test-rebase

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 2, 2024

@eggfoobar: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor

copejon commented Oct 2, 2024

Looks like the version fix did the trick!

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 2, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: copejon, eggfoobar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit b407a85 into openshift:main Oct 2, 2024
13 checks passed
@eggfoobar eggfoobar deleted the rebase-lvms-registry.redhat.io-lvms4-lvms-operator-bundle-v4.17.0-43 branch October 3, 2024 05:34
@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick release-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@pacevedom: #4009 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.17":

Applying: update last_lvms_rebase.sh
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	scripts/auto-rebase/last_lvms_rebase.sh
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging scripts/auto-rebase/last_lvms_rebase.sh
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in scripts/auto-rebase/last_lvms_rebase.sh
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 update last_lvms_rebase.sh
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

ggiguash commented Oct 6, 2024

/retitle OCPBUGS-41214: Rebase lvms registry.redhat.io lvms4 lvms operator bundle

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title Rebase lvms registry.redhat.io lvms4 lvms operator bundle v4.17.0 43 OCPBUGS-41214: Rebase lvms registry.redhat.io lvms4 lvms operator bundle Oct 6, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@eggfoobar: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41214 is in an unrecognized state (ON_QA) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Which issue(s) this PR addresses:

LVMS 4.17.0 GA

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants