Skip to content

Conversation

pmtk
Copy link
Member

@pmtk pmtk commented Jul 21, 2025

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@pmtk: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@pmtk pmtk changed the title NO-ISSUE: rebase-main-4.20.0-0.nightly-2025-07-20-021531_amd64-2025-07-20_arm64-2025-07-20 NO-ISSUE: Rebase 4.20 (Kube bump to 1.33) Jul 21, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from eslutsky and jogeo July 21, 2025 10:07
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 21, 2025
@pmtk pmtk force-pushed the rebase-kube-bump-4.20.0-0.nightly-2025-07-20-021531_amd64-2025-07-20_arm64-2025-07-20 branch 3 times, most recently from 98d1892 to 1116573 Compare July 21, 2025 13:33
@pmtk pmtk force-pushed the rebase-kube-bump-4.20.0-0.nightly-2025-07-20-021531_amd64-2025-07-20_arm64-2025-07-20 branch from fa489c1 to 8a926a2 Compare July 21, 2025 16:20
@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor

IPv6 failures should be ok by switching to EndpointSlice instead of plain Endpoint.

@pmtk pmtk marked this pull request as draft July 22, 2025 12:45
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 22, 2025
@pmtk pmtk force-pushed the rebase-kube-bump-4.20.0-0.nightly-2025-07-20-021531_amd64-2025-07-20_arm64-2025-07-20 branch from a6ffdbf to 31598b2 Compare July 22, 2025 12:46
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jul 22, 2025

/test ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus

@pmtk pmtk marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2025 13:58
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 22, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from copejon and dhensel-rh July 22, 2025 14:03
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jul 22, 2025

/retest ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus

@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jul 22, 2025

/test ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2025

@pmtk: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws-ai-model-serving
/test e2e-aws-footprint-and-performance
/test e2e-aws-tests
/test e2e-aws-tests-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm
/test ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus
/test ocp-full-conformance-serial-rhel-eus
/test test-rpm
/test test-unit
/test verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test images
/test security
/test test-rebase

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-images
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-ocp-full-conformance-serial-rhel-eus
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-security
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-rebase
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-unit
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify

In response to this:

/retest ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2025

@pmtk: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@eslutsky
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: eslutsky, pmtk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 669d290 into openshift:main Jul 22, 2025
12 checks passed
@pmtk pmtk deleted the rebase-kube-bump-4.20.0-0.nightly-2025-07-20-021531_amd64-2025-07-20_arm64-2025-07-20 branch July 23, 2025 06:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants