Skip to content

Conversation

sseago
Copy link
Contributor

@sseago sseago commented Jun 16, 2022

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from eemcmullan and kaovilai June 16, 2022 16:04
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 16, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #738 (9dd8632) into master (00ca426) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #738   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.96%   36.96%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        3219     3219           
=======================================
  Hits         1190     1190           
  Misses       1926     1926           
  Partials      103      103           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/common/common.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ee00674...9dd8632. Read the comment docs.

@sseago
Copy link
Contributor Author

sseago commented Jun 16, 2022

/retest-required

@sseago sseago changed the title updating CRDs and velero go mod dep prior to 1.9 release branch updating CRDs and velero go mod dep for konveyor-1.9 branch Jun 17, 2022
@sseago
Copy link
Contributor Author

sseago commented Jun 17, 2022

Once oadp-1.1 branch is created, the velero and plugins image tags need to be moved back to latest

once OADP release branch is created, the image tags need to be pointed back at latest
@@ -831,19 +831,19 @@ spec:
provider:
name: Red Hat
relatedImages:
- image: quay.io/konveyor/velero:latest
- image: quay.io/konveyor/velero:konveyor-1.9

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sseago do we want change the image tags from latest in master ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shubham-pampattiwar Yes -- for 2 reasons:

  1. konveyor-dev is currently at the point just before 1.9 was branched, but there's a bug with downloadrequests there that was fixed on 1.9 (and probably also on main)
  2. We can't use current main since there are not-for-1.9 CRD changes there already

Once oadp-1.1 branches are created in a month or so we'll re-point oadp master to latest.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The downloadrequest issue is why ci tests were failing with the earlier version of this PR pointing to latest.

@sseago
Copy link
Contributor Author

sseago commented Jun 17, 2022

/retest

@kaovilai
Copy link
Member

kaovilai commented Jun 21, 2022

@sseago please review and merge sseago#1 to fix e2e for vmware-tanzu/velero@a69bd8b

@weshayutin
Copy link
Contributor

@dymurray @sseago associated issue #?

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2022

@sseago: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dymurray dymurray changed the title updating CRDs and velero go mod dep for konveyor-1.9 branch [OADP-572] updating CRDs and velero go mod dep for konveyor-1.9 branch Jun 21, 2022
@dymurray dymurray changed the title [OADP-572] updating CRDs and velero go mod dep for konveyor-1.9 branch OADP-572 updating CRDs and velero go mod dep for konveyor-1.9 branch Jun 21, 2022
@dymurray
Copy link
Member

@sseago
Copy link
Contributor Author

sseago commented Jun 21, 2022

@dymurray all tests passed. I'm merging this now.

@sseago sseago merged commit d762d53 into openshift:master Jun 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants