Skip to content

golang 1.17, velero 1.9.1 CRDs, update go.mod #787

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2022
Merged

golang 1.17, velero 1.9.1 CRDs, update go.mod #787

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2022

Conversation

sseago
Copy link
Contributor

@sseago sseago commented Aug 11, 2022

No description provided.

@sseago sseago force-pushed the velero-1.9.1-crd-gomod branch from de21e64 to ebd871c Compare August 11, 2022 15:38
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 11, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #787 (88aa95b) into master (4c1c497) will decrease coverage by 0.16%.
The diff coverage is 63.15%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #787      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   31.98%   31.82%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          16       16              
  Lines        3064     3067       +3     
==========================================
- Hits          980      976       -4     
- Misses       1993     2000       +7     
  Partials       91       91
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
controllers/velero.go 48.45% <50.00%> (-0.17%) ⬇️
pkg/credentials/credentials.go 21.68% <58.33%> (-2.01%) ⬇️
controllers/datamover.go 12.99% <75.00%> (+0.45%) ⬆️
controllers/restic.go 48.71% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@sseago sseago force-pushed the velero-1.9.1-crd-gomod branch 2 times, most recently from 4b8cb22 to 88aa95b Compare August 11, 2022 17:00
@sseago sseago force-pushed the velero-1.9.1-crd-gomod branch from 88aa95b to 5e5ebc0 Compare August 11, 2022 17:33
@hhpatel14 hhpatel14 mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2022
Merged
@hhpatel14
Copy link
Contributor

/retest 4.10-operator-unit-test

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2022

@hhpatel14: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test 4.10-ci-index
  • /test 4.10-images
  • /test 4.10-operator-e2e-aws
  • /test 4.10-operator-e2e-azure
  • /test 4.10-operator-e2e-gcp
  • /test 4.10-operator-unit-test
  • /test 4.7-ci-index
  • /test 4.7-images
  • /test 4.7-operator-e2e-aws
  • /test 4.7-operator-e2e-azure
  • /test 4.7-operator-e2e-gcp
  • /test 4.7-operator-unit-test
  • /test 4.8-ci-index
  • /test 4.8-images
  • /test 4.8-operator-e2e-aws
  • /test 4.8-operator-e2e-azure
  • /test 4.8-operator-e2e-gcp
  • /test 4.8-operator-unit-test
  • /test 4.9-ci-index
  • /test 4.9-images
  • /test 4.9-operator-e2e-aws
  • /test 4.9-operator-e2e-azure
  • /test 4.9-operator-e2e-gcp
  • /test 4.9-operator-unit-test

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/retest 4.10-operator-unit-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hhpatel14
Copy link
Contributor

/test 4.10-operator-unit-test

@hhpatel14
Copy link
Contributor

/test 4.7-operator-unit-test
/test 4.8-operator-unit-test
/test 4.9-operator-unit-test

@shubham-pampattiwar
Copy link
Member

/retest

@kaovilai
Copy link
Member

Wait for openshift/release#31274 to merge before running retest

@sseago
Copy link
Contributor Author

sseago commented Aug 11, 2022

/retest

1 similar comment
@sseago
Copy link
Contributor Author

sseago commented Aug 11, 2022

/retest

@kaovilai
Copy link
Member

/override 4.10-operator-e2e-azure
/test 4.10-operator-e2e-azure
/override 4.8-operator-e2e-aws
/test 4.8-operator-e2e-aws
/override 4.8-operator-e2e-gcp
/test 4.8-operator-e2e-gcp
/override 4.8-operator-e2e-azure
/test 4.8-operator-e2e-azure
/override 4.9-operator-e2e-azure
/test 4.9-operator-e2e-azure

@kaovilai
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2022

@kaovilai: /override requires a failed status context, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • 4.10-operator-e2e-azure
  • 4.8-operator-e2e-aws
  • 4.8-operator-e2e-azure
  • 4.8-operator-e2e-gcp
  • 4.9-operator-e2e-azure

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • ci/prow/4.10-ci-index
  • ci/prow/4.10-images
  • ci/prow/4.10-operator-e2e-aws
  • ci/prow/4.10-operator-e2e-azure
  • ci/prow/4.10-operator-e2e-gcp
  • ci/prow/4.10-operator-unit-test
  • ci/prow/4.7-ci-index
  • ci/prow/4.7-images
  • ci/prow/4.7-operator-e2e-aws
  • ci/prow/4.7-operator-e2e-azure
  • ci/prow/4.7-operator-e2e-gcp
  • ci/prow/4.7-operator-unit-test
  • ci/prow/4.8-ci-index
  • ci/prow/4.8-images
  • ci/prow/4.8-operator-e2e-aws
  • ci/prow/4.8-operator-e2e-azure
  • ci/prow/4.8-operator-e2e-gcp
  • ci/prow/4.8-operator-unit-test
  • ci/prow/4.9-ci-index
  • ci/prow/4.9-images
  • ci/prow/4.9-operator-e2e-aws
  • ci/prow/4.9-operator-e2e-azure
  • ci/prow/4.9-operator-e2e-gcp
  • ci/prow/4.9-operator-unit-test
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.10-ci-index
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.10-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.10-operator-e2e-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.10-operator-e2e-azure
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.10-operator-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.10-operator-unit-test
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.7-ci-index
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.7-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.7-operator-e2e-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.7-operator-e2e-azure
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.7-operator-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.7-operator-unit-test
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.8-ci-index
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.8-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.8-operator-e2e-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.8-operator-e2e-azure
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.8-operator-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.8-operator-unit-test
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.9-ci-index
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.9-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.9-operator-e2e-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.9-operator-e2e-azure
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.9-operator-e2e-gcp
  • pull-ci-openshift-oadp-operator-master-4.9-operator-unit-test

In response to this:

/override 4.10-operator-e2e-azure
/test 4.10-operator-e2e-azure
/override 4.8-operator-e2e-aws
/test 4.8-operator-e2e-aws
/override 4.8-operator-e2e-gcp
/test 4.8-operator-e2e-gcp
/override 4.8-operator-e2e-azure
/test 4.8-operator-e2e-azure
/override 4.9-operator-e2e-azure
/test 4.9-operator-e2e-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kaovilai
Copy link
Member

/test 4.7-operator-e2e-aws

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2022

@sseago: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dymurray dymurray merged commit 8347592 into openshift:master Aug 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dymurray dymurray dymurray approved these changes

@shubham-pampattiwar shubham-pampattiwar shubham-pampattiwar approved these changes

@kaovilai kaovilai Awaiting requested review from kaovilai

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@sseago @codecov-commenter @hhpatel14 @shubham-pampattiwar @kaovilai @dymurray