Skip to content

Use dlrn consistent in cs10 master jobs #195

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

raukadah
Copy link
Contributor

RDO CS10 ftbfs are fixed in spec file and their changes get built in consistent dlrn tag.

Let's use that one instead of current.

RDO CS10 ftbfs are fixed in spec file and their changes
get built in consistent dlrn tag.

Let's use that one instead of current.

Signed-off-by: Chandan Kumar <[email protected]>
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 25, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dprince for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cescgina
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@amoralej
Copy link
Contributor

there are still 9 FTBFS in centos10-master https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos10-master/status_report.html and those will still keep blocking more recent builds in some components as common or ui, i'd keep current so far.

@raukadah
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold till we clear FTBFS

@raukadah
Copy link
Contributor Author

recheck

Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/bb4fbfc4fdb4430490ebd068e87d730e

openstack-meta-content-provider-master FAILURE in 21m 52s
⚠️ watcher-operator-validation-master SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-meta-content-provider-master (non-voting)
✔️ openstack-meta-content-provider-epoxy SUCCESS in 2h 05m 59s
✔️ watcher-operator-validation-epoxy SUCCESS in 1h 40m 23s
watcher-operator-validation-epoxy-ocp4-16 RETRY_LIMIT in 27m 33s
✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
⚠️ watcher-operator-kuttl SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-meta-content-provider-master

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants