Skip to content

ci(travis): adds awesome_bot for linting *.md files #230

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 2, 2020

Conversation

juancarlostong
Copy link
Contributor

@juancarlostong juancarlostong commented Dec 19, 2019

Summary

  • awesome_bot will check urls in md for broken links and generate report with suggestions
  • moved source clear in later stage

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.604% when pulling 78e197a on jctong/lint_md into d57e068 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 19, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.604% when pulling 1720451 on jctong/lint_md into d57e068 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.604% when pulling 78e197a on jctong/lint_md into d57e068 on master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.604% when pulling 78e197a on jctong/lint_md into d57e068 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.604% when pulling 78e197a on jctong/lint_md into d57e068 on master.

.travis.yml Outdated
script: "nosetests --with-coverage --cover-package=optimizely"
after_success:
- coveralls

# Linting and Integration tests need to run first to reset the PR build status to pending.
stages:
- name: 'Lint markdown files'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it just be 'Lint markdown files'?

@juancarlostong juancarlostong merged commit 0a6086c into master Jan 2, 2020
@juancarlostong juancarlostong deleted the jctong/lint_md branch January 2, 2020 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants