GitHub Community
Replies: 63 comments 60 replies
-
|
This has been a request for a few years now: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is really disappointing. Given how popular Python has become, this decision is pretty surprising. Looks like we'll need to consider alternatives like Artifactory. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Agreed. Especially seeing how simple the pypi repo api is. Alternatively it is possible to install packages directly through git access: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Or... prepare for amusement... Azure Artifacts. It has supported PyPi forever. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Come on... did they really come up with such a sentence? Such a corporate cliché... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hey guys, don't shoot the messenger 😆 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's really unfortunate that such a helpful feature is still not scheduled for development yet. Really hoping to see this in GitHub Beta in the near future! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This has been added to roadmap |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@davidkhala I think it's been in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I agree this is a great value add to the product, we do have this on our roadmap and we will try to get to near future. Unfortunately no ETA at the moment. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Our company is also requiring this feature as priority. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
my company too |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Really important to have this one for all the Python shops out there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Would love this feature so much <3 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Python packages would be very helpful |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
would love this feature so much! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
GitLab has had this available for at least a year already. Would be nice to see in GitHub as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
this feature would so much amazing! We need too! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
can't wait :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Would be great having this feature! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Please, please add this ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's on the public roadmap. There is no date for it though. Please make this happen 🙏 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I don't know if this post (given its age) is being monitored by anyone from the Github team ... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It really should be given the fact that packaging Python packages has become so common and standard in many projects. Providing a proper, official way to do this will boost Github's packaging support 👍> I don't know if this post (given its age) is being monitored by anyone from the Github team ... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This a superb idea, this will help my organization to not depend on external services such as JFROG and keep all our artifacts in one place. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi folks, I have contacted GitHub Support asking for this open discussion and this was the formal response.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you for taking the time to do this. It's unfortunate that this won't be happening soon. Maybe in 2024 ... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Maybe in 2025.... :( |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Maybe in 2026....:( |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is a fundamentally critical piece that is preventing a lot of companies from migrating away from GitLab, which has an excellent implementation of this. Quite shocking that Engineering is so blasé about it . |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Couldn't agree more. Microsoft, this is a must have for many data science teams before moving their codebase to GitHub! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
looking at this issue for this exact reason |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I would love this as a feature, but only if they actually implement it properly; right now, the existing implementation of Maven/Gradle support is half-baked and basically useless, and GitHub has removed any improvements to it from the Road Map. If hypothetical Python support ends up getting implemented only to the same level as the Maven/Gradle support, it's probably better not to have it at all - half-implemented support just gets people to naively try using it, and then constantly fighting against all the shortcomings and having to implement a bunch of workarounds, when you'd be better off just using a different solution from the start. In other words, if Python package support were implemented more like npm or RubyGems support, that'd be great. If it's only going to be implemented like Maven/Gradle support, then at least for me it'd be a hard pass. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Finally unsubscribing and accepting this is never happening. This was #94 in their roadmap and it's "closed as not planned" -- github/roadmap#94
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Snowflake built it :/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Such a crucial feature, and so easy to implement, likely the product team are blissfully unaware of how many commercial decisions are made based on this missing feature, and moreover the gain in market share they would get if they implemented it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Maybe they don't want this feature because they know it'll be heavily used and will require lots of dedicated resources. This topic was opened almost 5 years ago, it's absurd. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Not having this has meant my org has moved to a competing platform instead. The number of features we get with GitHub has not kept pace with others and we're divesting in those deficient areas. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
2025 and python packages registry not supported yet 👎 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Oddly, no official response from GitHub yet. Any way to promote this question so that it is given a higher priority? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Absolute bollocks. Not implementing a feature like this for over 5 years?? really? I have been working with GitLab for all this time and a new project uses Enterprise GitHub (PAID FOR) and not having a feature like this.... Will be recommending to move the project to GitLab. Utterly disappointing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It’s just that five years ago there wasn’t such a crazy AI hype. Maybe Microsoft is just hoping that AI will eventually implement this feature all by itself ) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yet here I am discovering that GitHub is owned by Microsoft. No wonder:))) I don't think it's about AI hype, the need to have this feature is really as basic as it gets for Python devs, to have a private managed registry, not all projects are open source and it just drives revenue that comes from projects that use a paid enterprise GitHub to the competition at GitLab and others. I'm surprised they implemented all other repos they currently have, but why a Python index repo that is not that hard of a system in its core is absolutely ignored is a mystery. I'd expect Microsoft to use AI to steal people's data and sell it to advertisers rather than use it for something useful _('<')_/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Such a basic feature and simple to implement but no response for 5 yrs!! Huge demand means huge traffic from users once it is implemented. Probably that's the reason for not implementing it!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We are developing a lot of internal python packages which cannot be uploaded to pypi and would benefit a lot from having a org-wide python package repository. GitHub does have package registries for many other eco-systems, like npm, but not python. Alas. I'd vote +100 for getting this in GitHub. We need it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hey GitHub! Just a thought: maybe you could instruct Copilot Agent to add support for Python package registry to your platform 🤔 /s |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
More like in galactic star date 6202
…On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 5:39 AM YunjiePan ***@***.***> wrote:
Maybe in 2026....:(
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8542 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWPVOPRPXLOEMNRSMVLZV33H6A4XAVCNFSM5JTJ353KU5DIOJSWCZC7NNSXTOSENFZWG5LTONUW63SDN5WW2ZLOOQ5TCMZXGMYDCNRV>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***
com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is this a joke ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah, pretty much. But don't worry, AI will solve this somehow, surely |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
and others
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Right now you could only upload to pypi or leave it like that. I want to upload my packages to GitHub packages just like docker, npm, gradle, maven etc. It would be awesome if you could release it in the public beta where users can simply go to feature preview and enable it.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions