Skip to content

chore: format module imports for readability #1183

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2025

Conversation

joshka
Copy link
Contributor

@joshka joshka commented Jun 20, 2025

No description provided.

@joshka joshka requested a review from orhun as a code owner June 20, 2025 23:31
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.92%. Comparing base (692345e) to head (f3e4b3c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1183      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.97%   41.92%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        2009     2009              
==========================================
- Hits          843      842       -1     
- Misses       1166     1167       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 41.92% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@orhun
Copy link
Owner

orhun commented Jun 22, 2025

Can you rebase this? 👀

@joshka joshka force-pushed the jm/reformat-imports branch from f9e7a71 to f3e4b3c Compare June 22, 2025 16:55
@orhun orhun merged commit 6db7d49 into orhun:main Jun 22, 2025
86 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants