✨ Support for detecting choco installer without required hash#1810
✨ Support for detecting choco installer without required hash#1810laurentsimon merged 6 commits intoossf:mainfrom Alan-Jowett:issue1807
Conversation
#1807 Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <alanjo@microsoft.com>
|
Integration tests success for |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1810 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 52.13% 55.28% +3.15%
==========================================
Files 77 77
Lines 6823 6857 +34
==========================================
+ Hits 3557 3791 +234
+ Misses 3023 2815 -208
- Partials 243 251 +8 |
laurentsimon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LG overall, thanks for the quick turnaround!
You just need to add a few more example in the files I provided in comment.
Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <alanjo@microsoft.com>
|
Integration tests success for |
|
Integration tests success for |
|
Integration tests success for |
|
Stale pull request message |
|
Integration tests success for |
|
Merged! Congrats on the PR! |
|
Integration tests success for |
Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett alanjo@microsoft.com
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Add support for detecting unpinned install using https://chocolatey.org/
What is the current behavior?
Scorecard ignores choco installs.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?**
Scorecard warns for choco installs with out required hash.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes
Fixes: #1807
Special notes for your reviewer
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
For user-facing changes, please add a concise, human-readable release note to
the
release-note(In particular, describe what changes users might need to make in their
application as a result of this pull request.)