Look for HIFFY_FUNCTIONS in both variables and definitions#554
Merged
Look for HIFFY_FUNCTIONS in both variables and definitions#554
HIFFY_FUNCTIONS in both variables and definitions#554Conversation
hawkw
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2025
Member
hawkw
left a comment
hawkw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall, looks good to me, one little correction for the comment you added.
mkeeter
force-pushed
the
mkeeter/finding-hiffy-functions
branch
from
ea0f1ca to
2c408c8
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See oxidecomputer/hubris#2169 ; this was broken by rust-lang/rust#140872