Skip to content

ASV: dt64arr_to_periodarr #35244

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 14, 2020

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

self.i8values = arr

def time_dt64arr_to_periodarr(self, size, freq, tz):
dt64arr_to_periodarr(self.i8values, freq, tz)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible to time the public function/method that in the end uses this instead?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

its possible, yes. but ATM im aiming for thorough coverage of tslibs in isolation, and PRs that dont touch tslibs can skip any of their asvs

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we likely already have coverage at a higher level, these fine-grained asv's are useful.

@jreback jreback added Benchmark Performance (ASV) benchmarks Period Period data type labels Jul 13, 2020
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.1 milestone Jul 13, 2020
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jul 13, 2020

checks are failing......

@jreback jreback merged commit e5dcdd1 into pandas-dev:master Jul 14, 2020
@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the asv-dt64arr_to_periodarr branch July 14, 2020 18:43
fangchenli pushed a commit to fangchenli/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Benchmark Performance (ASV) benchmarks Period Period data type
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants