settings #603
Merged
settings #603
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I am good with this, and if other indent plugins are also doing it, then I think it's a good idea for us to do it as well. The only thing I'd be worried about, is if for some reason, an older version of vim doesn't support those options, and could throw an error? |
|
those have been in vim since 7.0 or earlier |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
these don't seem to be very relevant when using indentexprs, and may override the indentation script,
opinions on this are welcomed, and honestly I don't know exactly what effect these have. the clojure indent file and a few others included with vim has these options set to off