Skip to content

Fix wrong mapping of AttributeType::CertificateType #116

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2023

Conversation

Bobo1239
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@wiktor-k wiktor-k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wiktor-k
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 #117 has been merged, this can be rebased on top of main and I think it'll build cleanly.

Copy link
Member

@ionut-arm ionut-arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 thanks!

@ionut-arm ionut-arm merged commit 9934be7 into parallaxsecond:main Jan 11, 2023
cfrantz added a commit to cfrantz/opentitan that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
Add parallaxsecond/rust-cryptoki#116 to
rust-cryptoki, allowing cryptoki to understand certificate
objects on the NitroKey.

Signed-off-by: Chris Frantz <[email protected]>
cfrantz added a commit to cfrantz/opentitan that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
Add parallaxsecond/rust-cryptoki#116 to
rust-cryptoki, allowing cryptoki to understand certificate
objects on the NitroKey.

Signed-off-by: Chris Frantz <[email protected]>
cfrantz added a commit to lowRISC/opentitan that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
Add parallaxsecond/rust-cryptoki#116 to
rust-cryptoki, allowing cryptoki to understand certificate
objects on the NitroKey.

Signed-off-by: Chris Frantz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants