Fix resolution of SwiftSyntax 600 #23
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When using swift-macro-testing in a package that depends on SwiftSyntax
600.0.0-prerelease(or600.0.0-latest), SwiftPM appears to be unable to reconcile the"509.0.0"..<"601.0.0"range with the600.0.0-prereleaserequirement from the dependent package.From my experience, it seems that SwiftPM doesn't like to resolve prerelease versions (
x.y.z-a) when supplied with a broader range. Providing the prerelease as an explicit upper bound fixes this.Not 100% sure this is a reliable approach, but it seems to fix the issue from my experience.Looks like this is intentional and including-prereleasein the range specifier is a kosher fix.Related:
Slack discussion