Skip to content

Conversation

@georgemac-labs
Copy link
Contributor

@buchen I realised that I forgot the refactoring you suggested.

Have attempted it here. See what you think.

@georgemac-labs georgemac-labs force-pushed the refactor/trades-view-to-use-tradeelement branch 2 times, most recently from 56f5402 to 30ca395 Compare November 9, 2025 23:50
@georgemac-labs georgemac-labs force-pushed the refactor/trades-view-to-use-tradeelement branch from 59d2ac1 to 608b7db Compare November 11, 2025 15:10
@georgemac-labs
Copy link
Contributor Author

@buchen I started to use sub-classifications in my taxonomies and noticed that my Trades implementation handles them in a weird way, and differently from other views (it flattens the tree and shows all classifications, with weird ordering). I'd like to fix that. Could you let me know if you envisage merging this PR? Then I would know which code to base the improvements on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant