Minor fixes #137
Minor fixes #137
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@latot has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request focuses on enhancing the clarity and structure of the documentation regarding topology and geometry representation in PostGIS. Key modifications include standardizing bullet point formatting, clarifying hierarchical relationships between Layers and Primitives, refining explanations of TopoElements and their roles, and improving the description of the Relation's table. The overall aim is to present technical details in a more accessible manner, ensuring a logical flow and better understanding of the content. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_topo_types.rst (2)
Line range hint
200-250: Enhance explanation of implicit identifiersThe section on implicit identifiers could be clearer with a concrete example.
Consider adding a practical example like this:
For example, when working with a topology named 'city_topology': * Full TopoGeometry Key: [topology_id=1, layer_id=2, topogeometry_id=3] * In relation's table (city_topology.relation): Only needs [layer_id=2, topogeometry_id=3] because topology_id is implicit from the schema name 'city_topology'
Missing image files detected in topology documentation
The verification shows that the referenced image files in the topology documentation are missing from the repository:
- ./topology/geomtable2topotable.png
- ./topology/topology_main_concept.png
- ./topology/hierarchy.png
- ./topology/topo_keys.png
- ./topology/components.png
- ./topology/topogeo2components.png
- ./topology/read_topoelement.png
This indicates that the image files referenced in the documentation are not present in the expected locations, which will result in broken image links when the documentation is rendered.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-200: Verify image references and consistencyLet's ensure all referenced images exist and have consistent attributes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check image references and their attributes # Find all image references and their attributes echo "Checking image references and their attributes:" rg -U '.. image::.*?\n(?:\s+:[^:]+:[^\n]+\n)*' | while read -r match; do echo "Found image reference:" echo "$match" echo "---" done # Verify image files exist echo -e "\nVerifying image files exist:" rg '.. image:: (.+)' -r '$1' | while read -r img; do if [ -f "${img#./}" ]; then echo "✓ Found: ${img#./}" else echo "✗ Missing: ${img#./}" fi doneLength of output: 111552
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
postgis-intro/sources/en/topology/components.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_topo_types.rst(1 hunks)
| * Layer contains | ||
|
|
||
| - TopoGeometries where each one one contains | ||
| - TopoElements where each one can represent a | ||
| * TopoGeometries where each one one contains: | ||
|
|
||
| - TopoGeometry of other Layer | ||
| - Primitive from the Topology | ||
| * TopoElements where each one can represent a: | ||
|
|
||
| - Nodes | ||
| - Edges | ||
| - Faces | ||
| - Geometry Collections | ||
| * TopoGeometry of other Layer | ||
| * Primitive from the Topology | ||
|
|
||
| * Nodes | ||
| * Edges | ||
| * Faces | ||
| * Geometry Collections |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix RST indentation for nested lists
The list structure is logically correct, but the indentation is inconsistent with RST standards. RST requires consistent indentation (typically 2 or 3 spaces) for nested lists.
Apply this formatting:
* Layer contains
* TopoGeometries where each one contains:
* TopoElements where each one can represent a:
* TopoGeometry of other Layer
* Primitive from the Topology
* Nodes
* Edges
* Faces
* Geometry Collections📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| * Layer contains | |
| - TopoGeometries where each one one contains | |
| - TopoElements where each one can represent a | |
| * TopoGeometries where each one one contains: | |
| - TopoGeometry of other Layer | |
| - Primitive from the Topology | |
| * TopoElements where each one can represent a: | |
| - Nodes | |
| - Edges | |
| - Faces | |
| - Geometry Collections | |
| * TopoGeometry of other Layer | |
| * Primitive from the Topology | |
| * Nodes | |
| * Edges | |
| * Faces | |
| * Geometry Collections | |
| * Layer contains | |
| * TopoGeometries where each one contains: | |
| * TopoElements where each one can represent a: | |
| * TopoGeometry of other Layer | |
| * Primitive from the Topology | |
| * Nodes | |
| * Edges | |
| * Faces | |
| * Geometry Collections |
| * Nodes | ||
| * Edges | ||
| * Faces | ||
| * Geometry Collections |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Geometry collections do not belong in the list of topology primitives
Fix a list format and a error on a image.