Skip to content

Conversation

@prateekbh
Copy link
Member

@prateekbh prateekbh commented Feb 16, 2018

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

bugfix

Did you add tests for your changes?
Nope

Summary
After this PR --no-service-worker flag will not even build the service worker hence lesser confusion

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Nope


Closes #420

@prateekbh prateekbh requested a review from lukeed February 16, 2018 21:49
Copy link
Member

@lukeed lukeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we revert the imports? 🙏 Otherwise looks good!

@prateekbh
Copy link
Member Author

@lukeed done

Copy link
Member

@reznord reznord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

Copy link
Member

@lukeed lukeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My bad, must have missed the first time 🙈

/\.map$/,
/push-manifest\.json$/,
/.DS_Store/,
/\.git/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, sorry, we wanna keep this guy #494

@lukeed
Copy link
Member

lukeed commented Feb 19, 2018

I forgot I can do it too, will push the final fix real quick~

@lukeed lukeed merged commit 3f670a4 into master Feb 19, 2018
@lukeed
Copy link
Member

lukeed commented Feb 19, 2018

Thanks @prateekbh 😄

@lukeed lukeed deleted the noSWForFlagFix branch February 19, 2018 04:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

--service-worker=false still generates service worker

4 participants